1. strengths: a. uses good in text citations with good explanations for evidence
b. has a good reference page
c. sections the paper well so it is easy to read and understand what the author is talking about about
weaknesses: a. could've used more evidence from interview
b. the non-acedmic section could have included more evidence
c. i dont like how the author started with a quote
2. strength: a. short and to the point
b. uses a lot of evindence from the interview
c. explained the evidence well
weaknesses: a. too causal for the assignment
b. not sectioned so hard to follow the authors thoughts
c. very short and a bad reference page
3. strengths: a. uses a lot of in text citations
b. good use of division of ideas - makes the paper flow better
c. good reference page
weaknesses: a. over explains evidence - repeats ideas a lot
b. short conclusion
c. doesn't use enough evidence from interview
4. strength: a. explains evidence well and links it back to claim
b. uses a lot of evidence to support claim
c. flows very easily
weaknesses: a. lengthy intro paragraph
b. short conclusion
c. could explain better for people who are not engineers
5. strengths: a. good introduction
b. uses a lot of evidence to back up claim
c. organizes paper well
weakness: a. kinda choppy - doesn't flow very well
b. doesn't have a very good reference page
c. short conclusion
No comments:
Post a Comment